Legal Opinion
Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. Rosen
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 22, 1986No. Civ. A. C 86-1099 APublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
This action was filed on March 21, 1986 by plaintiffs challenging the constitutionality of Amended Substitute House Bill Number 319 (“H.B. 319”), which requires that a physician who intends to induce an abortion on an unmarried, unemancipated woman under the age of eighteen must notify her parents, unless one of several exceptions, including a waiver by a juvenile court, is present. The complaint seeks a declaratory judgment that H.B. 319 is unconstitutional on its face, and prays for injunctive relief against its enforcement.
On March 31, 1986,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- McInnis-Misenor v. Maine Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Planned Parenthood Association Of The Atlanta Area, Inc. v. Zell MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Hodgson v. State of Minn.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Summit Medical Associates, P.C. v. JamesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.