Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Mooney Aircraft Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 2006No. Civ.A. 03-221PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT F. KELLY, District Judge.

Before this Court are the Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Mooney Aircraft Company (“Mooney”) and Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell”). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motions are granted in full.

I. BACKGROUND

This action arises out of an airplane crash that resulted in the deaths of pilot Peter Sandek (“Peter”), his wife Jo Ellen, and their son Kyle (collectively the “San-deks”). Geoffrey Gish, a Georgia resident appointed as representative for the estates of the decedents, filed these wrongful death and survival…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re September 11th LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Henning v. Suarez Corp. Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API