Legal Opinion

Baker State Bank v. Grant

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1917No. 3,785PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Fallon County; Daniel L. O’Hern, Judge. Action by the Baker State Bank against J. M. Grant and others. From a judgment for plaintiff and from an order denying them a new trial, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

On April 17, 1913, J. M. Grant, J. J. Johnston and B. V. Fuqua executed and delivered to Charles E. Clark ten promissory notes, each- for the sum of $200. Before maturity of any of the notes they were all indorsed and transferred by Clark to the Baker State Bank for their face value. The first note was paid at maturity and this action was brought to enforce payment of the other nine notes.

The principal defense interposed is that the ten notes were [1] given in payment for an automobile, sold and delivered by Clai’k to the defendants under an express warranty that the car would pexfform the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jennings v. ToddSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. Chicago Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Miller v. OttawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. United States National Bank v. FlossOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Rublee v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commercial Credit Co. v. M. McDonough Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Interstate Bankers Corp. v. KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Barbour v. Handlos Real Estate & Building Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. East Lansing State Bank v. KeilMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. First National Bank v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API