Legal Opinion

East Lansing State Bank v. Keil

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1920No. Docket No. 42PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Ingham; Wiest (Howard), J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by the East Lansing State Bank against Edward A. Keil for the amount of a check. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

G. E. Chivington of Ohio sold several *18horses at a public auction in Lansing. He was assisted by an auctioneer and by Mr. Nash, cashier of the plaintiff bank, who acted as clerk of the auction and who was paid by Chivington for the service. Both Chivington and the auctioneer made general and public statements warranting the horses to be sound. These statements were heard by the cashier. Defendant purchased a horse at the sale for which he gave his personal check payable to' Chivington and drawn on the Farmers State Bank of Webberville, Mich. Two days later defendant’s check with others arising…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jennings v. ToddSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. Chicago Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hakes v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Miller v. OttawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. United States National Bank v. FlossOregon Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barbour v. Handlos Real Estate & Building Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Huler v. NasserMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. First & Lumbermen's National Bank v. BuchholzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Cotton v. John Deere Plow Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Lincoln Investment Co. v. MetrosMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API