Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Stuart's Draft Milling Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to. a judgment of the Circuit Court of Augusta county in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.
The following are the essential facts in this case: The defendant in error, the Stuart’s Draft Milling Company, which was the plaintiff in the trial court, is a domestic corporation, engaged in the manufacture and sale of flour at Stuart’s Draft, in Augusta county, Virginia. The plaintiff in error, the Norfolk and Western Eailway Company, which was the defendant in the lower court, is likewise a Virginia corporation, a common carrier employed in both intrastate and interstate commerce. Its road extends through the State of Virginia, and into the States of Maryland, West Virginia, Ohio,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ala. & Tenn. Rivers Railroad v. KiddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. BeasleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
- Pindell v. St. Louis & Hannibal Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1890
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stoddard Lumber Co. v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Hogan Milling Co. v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Louisville & N. R. R. v. BrewerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Wien v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Model Mill Co. v. Carolina, C. & O. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.