Legal Opinion

Model Mill Co. v. Carolina, C. & O. Ry. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

PROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Washington County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certio-rari to the Court of Civil' Appeals from the Supreme Court — C. J. St. John, Special Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buchacas

The hill sought a decree against the railway company for $850 and interest, and rested on the theory, that the railway company converted to its own use a carload of flour, shipped over its line. It.appears that on January 17, 1911, the Model Mill Company, through one of its several agents, ma,de a conditional-sale of two hundred barrels of flour to Murphy & Co., of Augusta, Ga. $4.25 per barrel, delivered at Augusta, Ga., was the price agreed on, and it was agreed that the quality of the flour should be equal to that of a sample shown Murphy & Co. by the sales agent of the mill company.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Charles v. CarterTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Dudley v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Stuart's Draft Milling Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  4. Hogan Milling Co. v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Louisville & N. R. R. v. BrewerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Strickland Transp. Co., Inc. v. American Distributing CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  2. Hines v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Sindle v. American Railway Express Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  4. Keystone Publishing Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Tennessee Packers, Inc. v. Tennessee Central Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API