Legal Opinion

ANDREW BUTLER v. HENRY HARDEN

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2016No. 14-CV-1367PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Associate Judge:

The record on appeal establishes that a Superior Court judge entered a judgment for possession of appellant’s rental unit at 1427 Holbrook Street, N.E., as well as a money judgment in favor of the appellee landlord, even though (1) appellant had appeared in the Landlord Tenant (“L & T”) case and (2) the landlord failed to present ex parte proof of the rent allegedly owed. Therefore, as we explain below, the judgments were void. This means that the ruling that is before us on appeal — a judgment reinstating the judgments for possession and back rent that .had earlier…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. HershDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Klein v. RappaportDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. W.H.H. Trice & Co. v. FarisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Wade v. Union Storage & Transfer Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. TURQUOISE WYLIE v. GLENNCREST.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API