Klein v. Rappaport
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
Eugenia Klein asks us to vacate a judgment by default which was entered against her in the trial court without proof. She had been sued for the value of certain work performed and drapery materials furnished by -plaintiff. She filed an answer denying any indebtedness to plaintiff and denying that she had purchased any merchandise from him. The answer asserted that the work had been performed in an unwork-man-like manner and that plaintiff had ruined the material she had furnished him. She also filed a counterclaim demanding the value of the material furnished to and ruined…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bass v. HoaglandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ken-Mar Airpark Inc. v. Toth Aircraft & Accessories Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1952
- Commercial Casualty Ins. v. White Line Transfer & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re the Estate of CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
- Stafford v. DickisonHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- Coulas v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Jones v. HershDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Feaster v. FeasterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.