Erdman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
Appellant Gary Erdman (Erdman) contends that a hearing examiner erred in denying his motion for voluntary withdrawal of his permanent partial disability claim, with prejudice. That claim was filed several years after, and as an adjunct to, a work-related injury, which was covered by worker's compensation benefits. We affirm.
ISSUES
Erdman posits this issue:
Whether the Hearing Examiner erred in dismissing Appellant's permanent partial disability claim with prejudice.
The Workers' Safety and Compensation Divi-gion (Division) states this issue:
After the Employee requested a hearing on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Casper v. UtechWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Martinez v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Pederson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Worker's Comp. Claim of JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Lunde v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Johnson v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Lunde v. STATE EX REL. WORKERS'COMP. DIV.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000