Legal Opinion

Erdman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2000No. 99-215PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

Appellant Gary Erdman (Erdman) contends that a hearing examiner erred in denying his motion for voluntary withdrawal of his permanent partial disability claim, with prejudice. That claim was filed several years after, and as an adjunct to, a work-related injury, which was covered by worker's compensation benefits. We affirm.

ISSUES

Erdman posits this issue:

Whether the Hearing Examiner erred in dismissing Appellant's permanent partial disability claim with prejudice.

The Workers' Safety and Compensation Divi-gion (Division) states this issue:

After the Employee requested a hearing on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. City of Casper v. UtechWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Martinez v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Pederson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Worker's Comp. Claim of JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lunde v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Johnson v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Lunde v. STATE EX REL. WORKERS'COMP. DIV.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API