Legal Opinion
Weinstein v. Anderson
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided December 8, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On February 10th, 1927, the defendants Anderson, Moskowitz and Bertschy were appointed receivers of a corporation known as the Economy Housing and Construction Company, and were directed by a subsequent order to complete the building of a number of small dwelling houses in Bergen county. In furtherance of that object, permission was given them to issue and negotiate their official certificates. Only one certificate for a small sum has been converted into cash.
Before the appointment of the receivers the corporation which they succeeded executed its bond and mortgage to the United States…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Central Trust Co. v. Continental Iron WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- Micele v. FaldutiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Warp v. CookeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1864
- Jacobus v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1876
- Bell v. Fleming's executorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1859
3Cited by6 opinions
- Metrobank v. National Com. BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Bloomfield Bk., C., Co v. Temple B'nai Zion, C.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Cox v. RKA CORP.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Cox v. RKA CORP.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Integrity Trust Co. v. Club Atlantic, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.