Legal Opinion

Central Trust Co. v. Continental Iron Works

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1893PublishedCited by 11 opinions

On appeal from that part of the decree in the above-stated cause advised by Vice-Chancellor Van Fleet which declares that the lien claims of Bartlett, Hayward & Co., the Continental Iron Works, and August Bretthauer are encumbrances on the building and curtilage “ prior to the mortgage of the complainant, or any bond or debt, or interest secured, or intended to be secured, by said mortgage.”

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

This writ is prosecuted for the foreclosure of a trust mortgage made by the Metropolitan Gas Light Company, of Elizabeth, New-Jersey, to the Central Trust Company, of New York, trustee, to secure seven hundred bonds of $500 each. The mortgage is dated July 19th, 1889, delivered the same day and recorded July 22d, 1889.

The mortgage is in the usual form of mortgages by corporations to secure the issue of bonds. It recites the resolution of the board of directors of the company, authorizing the issuing of the bonds and the execution of the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Micele v. FaldutiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  2. LINCOLN FED'L S. & L. ASS'N v. Platt Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  3. Weinstein v. AndersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  4. Warner v. Cranford Printing, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  5. Krause v. HartungNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API