Warp v. Cooke
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The only controversy in this cause relates to the amount due upon the complainant’s mortgage. The mortgage is given by Cooke and wife to the complainant, to secure the payment of a bond from Cooke to the complainant for $900, dated on the 1st of July, 1856, and payable in one year, with interest at seven per cent. The mortgage bears even date with the bond. A second mortgage upon the premises was given by Cooke and wife to Peter S. Talmage, to secure the payment of $1000, which remains unpaid.
The mortgagor, by his answer, alleges that there remains due on the mortgage of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shirras & Others v. Caig & MitchelSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Truscott v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1849
3Cited by7 opinions
- LINCOLN FED'L S. & L. ASS'N v. Platt Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Weinstein v. AndersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. v. Vanessa BenunNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- Cox v. RKA CORP.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Cox v. RKA CORP.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.