Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
People v. Westwood
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided September 20, 2016Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWeston, J.
(dissenting in part and concurring in part and voting to modify the judgment of conviction by vacating the convictions of aggravated harassment in the second degree, stalking in the fourth degree, and harassment in the second degree, and dismissing the counts of the accusatory instrument charging these offenses, in the following memorandum). I agree with the majority that the conviction of aggravated harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.30 [1]) should be reversed and the count of the accusatory instrument alleging that offense dismissed (see People v Golb, 23 NY3d 455, 466-467…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. GolbNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. PaytonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1994
- In re Lonique M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. TralliAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.