Legal Opinion

Williams v. Cross

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1944No. 14752PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

1. A bill of exceptions to a ruling made pendente lite, which does not assign error upon any final judgment or a judgment which would have been final if rendered as claimed by the plaintiff in error, will not be entertained by this court. Suson v. Bank of Covington, 158 Ga. 434 (123 S. E. 742).

2. “Objections which go to the judgment only, and do not extend to the verdict, can not properly be made grounds of a motion for new trial. . . No new trial is necessary to correct a judgment or decree. If a judgment or decree is erroneous or illegal, direct exception should be taken…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Lingo v. RichSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Huson v. Bank of CovingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Alred v. AlredSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Griffin v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Albany Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Ballard v. HarmonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Myers v. AdcockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Hensel Phelps Construction Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API