Legal Opinion

Blake-Rutherford Farms Co. v. Holt Manufacturing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1912No. 10418PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal' from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered February 17, 1912, upon findings in favor of the defendant, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for rescission.

1Per curiam

In this case the complaint set up two causes of action. In the first, the plaintiff sought a rescission of the purchase of a traction farm engine, known as a “caterpillar,” and a return of the purchase price. In the second, it sought to recover damages for loss of profits upon work which the plaintiff claimed to have undertaken to do with the engine for other people, upon the strength of certain alleged *193representations of the defendant as to the amount and character of work which the engine would perform. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained upon the ground that the two causes of action…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Houser & Haines Manufacturing Co. v. McKayWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Falls City Machinery & Supply Co. v. GoodsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Larson v. Union Investment & Loan Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Holt Manufacturing Co. v. StrachanWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Hart-Parr Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Soules v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Sussman v. Mitsui & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API