Legal Opinion

Soules v. Cox

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1959No. 34778PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is an action by the plaintiff buyer to recover a sum paid as earnest money on two earnest-money agreements. The two agreements, each datéd April 18, 1956, covered adjacent properties and, with the exception of descriptions and amounts, were identical in terms.

*599Each agreement contained an addendum which provided that the buyer’s offer was contingent upon the acceptance of the offer made in the other earnest-money agreement; that, if without fault of the buyer he was unable to complete the purchase of the land described in the other agreement, he could terminate the agreement, and all…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blake-Rutherford Farms Co. v. Holt Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jenson v. RichensWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Kofmehl v. Baseline Lake, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Australaska Corporation v. Sisters of CharityAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Kofmehl v. Baseline Lake, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API