Soules v. Cox
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
This is an action by the plaintiff buyer to recover a sum paid as earnest money on two earnest-money agreements. The two agreements, each datéd April 18, 1956, covered adjacent properties and, with the exception of descriptions and amounts, were identical in terms.
*599Each agreement contained an addendum which provided that the buyer’s offer was contingent upon the acceptance of the offer made in the other earnest-money agreement; that, if without fault of the buyer he was unable to complete the purchase of the land described in the other agreement, he could terminate the agreement, and all…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Blake-Rutherford Farms Co. v. Holt Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jenson v. RichensWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Kofmehl v. Baseline Lake, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Australaska Corporation v. Sisters of CharityAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
- Kofmehl v. Baseline Lake, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2013