People v. DiLuca
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Brown, J.
Upon these appeals we are asked to consider whether jurors may be allowed to take notes during trial.
The indictment of the defendants arises out of the transfer of the sum of $2,000 from defendant Petrizzo to an individual named Lido Occhiuto. It was charged that Pe*440trizzo gave said moneys to Occhiuto as a loan and threatened him with physical harm if he defaulted; that Occhiuto was to pay interest on the loan at the rate of $100 a week until he could pay back the original $2,000 and that he made several weekly $100 payments to defendant DiLuca who was acting on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. ConaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- United States v. CarlisiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940
- Bolm v. Triumph Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3Cited by58 opinions
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. WaddellOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. TriplettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. WhittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.