Legal Opinion

State v. Waddell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1996No. 94-2462PublishedCited by 170 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

Appellee contends that the actions of the trial court, furnishing the prospective jurors with notepads and instructing the jurors that they were permitted to take notes, amounted to prejudicial error. Therefore, urges appel-lee, the court of appeals was correct in reversing the judgment of the trial court and remanding the cause for a new trial. We disagree.

As an initial matter, we note that appellee did not timely object to the actions of the trial court. In considering this matter, the court of appeals concluded that neither counsel for appellee nor counsel for appellant was afforded an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Jordan v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. LozaOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. CarpenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. CarpenterOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. BagleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API