Legal Opinion
Spence-Parker v. Delaware River and Bay Authority
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 30, 2009No. Civil 08-3740 (JBS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court upon Defendant Delaware River and Bay Authority’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint [Docket Item 4]. Plaintiffs relatively straightforward claims, premised upon New Jersey statutory and common law, are complicated by the fact that the Delaware River and Bay Authority (the “DRBA” or “Authority”), is a bistate Compact Clause entity that is “not subject to the unilateral control of any one of the States that, compose the federal system.” Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp., 513 U.S. 30, 42, 115 S.Ct. 394,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- SPENCE-PARKER v. Delaware River and Bay AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Ingerman v. Delaware River Port AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- CRESPO v. MERCK & CO., INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY v. WALSHDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION, U.S.A. v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.