Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People of State of Illinois v. Flowers

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 3, 2002No. 3-01-0083, 3-01-0084, 3-01-0085 Cons. RelPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE LYTTON

delivered the opinion of the court:

After the defendant, Eleanor Flowers, negotiated an agreement that the State would recommend four-year concurrent prison sentences, she pled guilty to a total of seven counts of forgery (720 ILCS 5/17 — 3(a)(2) (West 1998)) in three consolidated cases. At the guilty plea hearing, the trial judge did not admonish her that she could be ordered to pay restitution. The judge did not concur in the plea agreement and instead sentenced defendant to concurrent five-year terms of imprisonment. She also was ordered to pay restitution and court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. WilkIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. JanesIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. LinderIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. FlowersIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. People v. Flowers Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing - replaces opinion filed 11/20/03Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API