Legal Opinion

People v. Foster

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1996No. 78785PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

This case addresses the ramifications of a defendant’s failure to file a written motion for reconsideration of a sentence in violation of Rule 604(d) where the trial judge has also failed to admonish the defendant regarding this requirement as mandated by Rule 605(b). The appellate court dismissed defendant’s appeal of his sentence (No. 4 — 94—0451 (unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23)), ruling that it could not consider the appropriateness of defendant’s sentence because of defendant’s failure to comply with the written-motion requirement of Rule 604(d). This court granted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WilkIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. JanesIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. WallaceIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. PearsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. KelleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. People v. FlowersIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. LinderIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. BurtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. JamisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. BreedloveIllinois Supreme Court · 2004

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API