Legal Opinion
Norwood v. Vance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 9, 2009No. 07-17322, 08-15778PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion filed July 9, 2009, 572 F.3d 626, is amended as follows:
Page 629, column 1, line 26, Add a footnote after “Defendants appeal.” stating: “Only an Eighth Amendment outdoor exercise claim is before us on this appeal. We therefore express no view as to the race-based aspect of the lockdowns or any potential Equal Protection claim.”
Page 632, column 2, lines 36-37, Replace “constitution” with “Eighth Amendment”
Page 633, column 1, line 35, Replace “lawful” with “consistent with the Eighth Amendment”
Appellee’s Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing en…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hoptowit v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Samuel Lemaire v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Samuel Lemaire v. Manfred Maass, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Miriam Mendiola-Martinez v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Garrick Harrington v. A. ScribnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Hunter v. County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, NACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Community House, Inc. v. City of Boise, IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.