Legal Opinion
Donar v. King Associates., Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 18, 2001No. AC 20747PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The defendant, King Associates, Inc., appeals from the judgment on its counterclaim, rendered by the trial court in favor of the intervening plaintiff, United Coastal Industries, Inc., one of two plaintiffs in this action. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly granted the intervening plaintiffs motion to strike the defendant’s substitute counterclaim. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the defendant’s appeal. Sometime before December 2, 1996,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Novametrix Medical Systems, Inc. v. BOC Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Levine v. MasseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Skuzinski v. Bouchard Fuels, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Jewish Home for Elderly of Fairfield County, Inc. v. CantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Isaacs v. OttavianoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fidelity Bank v. KreniskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Commissioner of Labor v. C.J.M. Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Zeigler v. Sony Corp. of AmericaConnecticut Superior Court · 2004
- Campbell v. PorterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Commissioner of Labor v. C.J.M. Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.