Legal Opinion

HODGES v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00005Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KIMBERLY HODGES, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, NO. 23-5 Defendant. MEMORANDUM HODGE, J. July 28, 2023 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Defendant Bristol-Myers Squibb Company’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Case. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff, Kimberly Hodges, opposed the motion, and Defendant filed a reply. (ECF Nos. 10–11.) For the reasons that follow, the Court grants the Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Case. II. BACKGROUND On January 3, 2023, Plaintiff—a former employee of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Century Indemnity Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Charles Harris v. Green Tree Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Martindale v. Sandvik, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API