Legal Opinion

KMart Corp. v. First Hartford Realty Corp.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 4, 1993No. Civ. A. 2:92 CV00646 (AVC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

COVELLO, District Judge.

This is an action for specific performance of a contract, an injunction and other relief. The plaintiff, KMart Corporation, (KMart), seeks a temporary and permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with KMart’s alleged leasehold interest in a forty-six acre parcel of real property located in Putnam, Connecticut. The parties have asked the court to determine the equitable and liability issues only, leaving the matter of damages, if any, to the further order of the court. The court concludes for the reasons hereinafter set…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Zaist v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  3. Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Hess v. Dumouchel Paper Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Futuresource LLC v. Reuters Limited Reuters S.A. And Reuters America Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Beyond Gravity Sweden AB v. Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
  4. Futuresource LLC v. Reuters LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API