Legal Opinion
Haas v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided October 15, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal by plaintiffs from judgment of the City Court of the city of New York dismissing the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
The action was brought by Leopold Haas upon defendant’s policy insuring against burglary, larceny and theft to recover the sum of $920, the *5alleged value of a diamond ring, diamond breastpin and silk robe claimed to have been stolen from the residence of the holder of the policy between November 16, 1912, and January 7,1913. There have been three trials in this case. Before the first trial the plaintiff died, and the action was continued by his executors.
The testimony introduced by the plaintiffs at the last trial was that Leopold Haas, the owner of the diamond ring, lived at 19 West…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stich v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
- Orlando v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915
- Fienglas v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1915
3Cited by4 opinions
- Levine v. Accident & Casualty InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
- Emery v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Klein & Brown, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCivil Court of the City of New York · 1969
- Van Vechten v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923