Legal Opinion

Cowitz v. Miller

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1966No. 37812PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing with prejudice his claim for damages. Defendant-respondent did not file a brief in this court.

The case was tried to the court. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence a challenge to its sufficiency was sustained. The judge announced in his oral opinion that he was weighing the evidence, hence it would be necessary to enter findings óf fact and conclusions of law.

The posture of this appeal is, therefore, controlled by the rule expressed in Richards v. Kuppinger, 46 Wn.2d 62, 278 P.2d 395 (1955), and interpreted, after our decision in Thorndike v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Richards v. KuppingerWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Mayflower Air-Conditioners, Inc. v. West Coast Heating Supply, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bennett Veneer Factors, Inc. v. BrewerWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. N. Fiorito Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Safeco Insurance v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hatley v. WestWashington Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API