United States v. Zavelo
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Contempt proceedings against B. Zavelo and certain others for serving civil process on witnesses under subpoena by the United States to testify in a criminal proceeding by the United States against Zavelo and others, during a witness’ attendance at the court.
1Opinion of the Court
GRUBB, District Judge.
This matter comes up for decision upon a rule served upon the respondents, at the instance of the United States attorney, citing each of them to show cause why they should not be attached for a contempt of the Circuit Court arising out of the facts herein set out.
The respondent Zavelo was a defendant in a criminal prosecution in the District Court. Certain witnesses for the government were brought to Birmingham, the place of trial of this cause, bjr it from another state, but were regularly subpoenaed as witnesses in the cause. After the termination of the criminal suit,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. ShippSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Bridges v. SheldonUnited States Circuit Court · 1880
- In re HealeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1881
- Larned v. GriffinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1882
- Atchison v. MorrisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nye v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Toledo Newspaper Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1915
- United States v. HuffDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1913
- State ex rel. Weast v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- In Re Portland Electric Power Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.