Legal Opinion

Goussis v. Kimball

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 18, 1993No. 92-CV-3420PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBRENO, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff is a foreign born and trained physician. This case arises out of Plaintiff’s failure to pass on four separate occasions the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (“ABIM”) qualifying examination for the medical subspecialty certification of endocrinology and metabolism.

Plaintiff claims that Defendants invidiously discriminated against him because of his foreign birth and foreign medical training, resulting in the deprivation of Plaintiff’s property without due process and equal protection. The factual core of Plaintiff’s claim is that…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jesse Brown, Rev., On Behalf Of Himself And All Members Of The Uptown Coalition For Tobacco Control And Health v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Brown v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. Hennessy v. SantiagoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Spencer v. SteinmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Verdon v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API