Hennessy v. Santiago
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HUDOCK, Judge:
This is an appeal from the order of the trial court granting Appellees’ preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The pertinent facts and procedural history of this case can be summarized as follows: Margaret Hennessy (Appellant) was employed by Dr. Jose Santiago (Santiago) as a habilitative counselor. Appellant counseled clients of both Santiago’s individual practice and the corporation of which he controlled fifty percent, the Alliance for Behavioral Developmental Disability (ABDD). ABDD provided community living arrangements for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Reading Radio, Inc. v. FinkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Donahue v. Federal Express Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Haun v. Community Health Systems, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.