Legal Opinion

May v. Frauhiger

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1999No. 43A03-9809-CV-398PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge

Appellant-plaintiff Robin R. May appeals the trial court’s partial grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees-defen-dants Kim and Herman Frauhiger and Whirlpool Quickclean Sales (collectively, Frauhiger) with regard to May’s claim for defamation and for tortious interference with a contract or with a business relationship. Specifically, May contends that the trial court erred when it found that no genuine issues of material fact existed where Frauhiger failed to appropriately designate evidentiary matters for the trial court’s consideration, where May’s designated…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Schrader v. Eli Lilly and Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Bals v. VerduzcoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Bochnowski v. Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. General Motors Corp. v. Northrop Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Williams v. TharpIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. PSI Energy, Inc. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Dietz v. Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Little Beverage Co., Inc. v. DePrezIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Munsell v. HambrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API