Legal Opinion

Neptune v. Tyler

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1895No. 1,858PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The appellee in this case advanced to the appellant, as administrator of her husband’s estate, $32,470.00, which was used by him in paying-just and valid claims against said estate. Her right to recover, if such right exists, rests on the equitable doctrine of subrogation. In her claim it is alleged, among other things, that the said Wilson M. Tyler died seized of a large and valuable estate1, in real and personal property, supposed to be worth about $100,000.00. There was no agreement that the money should be repaid to her. In the. court below she recovered judgment for the amount of her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. ForstIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. DickeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Pease v. ChristmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Merrill v. ComstockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Chamness v. ChamnessIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. City of Michigan City v. MarwickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API