Dynamic Balancing Mach. Co. v. Akimoff
District Court, E.D. Michigan
In Equity. Suit by the Dynamic Balancing Machine Company and others against Akimoff and others.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
This is a bill for an injunction to restrain the infringement of letters patent No. 1,296,606 and 1,296,610, both granted March 11, 1912, and issued to Dynamic Balancing Machine Company, one of the plaintiffs, as assignee, by mesne assignments of the applications of Nicholas W. Akimoff, one of the defendants. The plaintiffs CaiJson-Wenstrom. Company, Lippincott-Carwen Corporation, and Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company are licensees' under the patents. The defendant Nicholas W. Akimoff is the president of the defendant Vibration Specialty Company. The claims in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hobbs v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Steward v. American Lava Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Noonan v. Chester Park Athletic Club Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stubnitz-Greene Spring Corp. v. Fort Pitt Bedding Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Heller Bros. v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
- National Cash Register Co. v. Remington Arms Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1922
- Trumbull v. KirschbraunCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Akimoff v. Dynamic Balancing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.