Legal Opinion
Heller Bros. v. Crucible Steel Co. of America
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 12, 1924No. 3077PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, District Judge.
Crucible .Steel Company of America by its bill of complaint charges Heller Bros. Company with infringement of letters patent No. 993,631, dated May 30, 1911, for a method of manufacturing hollow metal rods, bars, and the like. The defenses are invalidity and noninfringement. The court below found both claims of the patent valid and infringed.
The application for the patent contained, originally, no process claims. By amendment the original claims were struck out and two process claims were substituted. The substitution was unaccompanied by a supplemental oath. The…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Hobbs v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Kennedy v. HazeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Marsh v. Nichols, Shepard & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Steward v. American Lava Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- American Safety Table Co. v. SchreiberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Diamond Power Specialty Corporation v. Bayer Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- American Safety Table Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. Joseph Schreiber and David Goldberg, Individually and as Partners Trading as Schreiber & Goldberg, Defendants-Appellees-Appellants. American Safety Table Company, Inc. v. Joseph Schreiber and David Goldberg, Individually and as Partners Trading as Schreiber & GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Gibson v. Smoot Engineering Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1928
- Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Abraham Straus, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.