Legal Opinion
Trumbull v. Kirschbraun
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 30, 1933No. Patent Appeal 3191PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.
On March 11, 1927, an interference proceeding was instituted and declared between a patent issued to Harlan L. Trumbull and John B. Dickson, appellants, on October 28, 1924, on an application filed September 7, 1922, and an application of the appellee, Lester Kirseh,byaun, filed October 25, 1926, for a similar invention. There wore thirteen counts in the interference. Appellants suggest, and we concur, that counts 1, 2, 7, and 12 are representative of the issues of the interference. They are as follows:
“1. The method of dispersing a gum into a colloidal substance which…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Consolidated Fruit-Jar Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- The Incandescent Lamp PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Field v. Knowles. Field v. KnowlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Hemphill Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Marion Den Beste v. Harry MartinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Hendrickson & Nelson v. Ronning & RonningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.