Legal Opinion

Curtis Building Co. v. Tunstall

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1978No. Appeal, No. 635 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

Curtis Building Co., Inc. (Curtis) appeals from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County declaring invalid a treasurer’s deed under which Curtis claimed title to property owned by Joseph L. Tunstall, Jr., and Mary E. Tunstall. The property had been sold to Curtis at a treasurer’s sale for the nonpayment of 1966 real estate taxes. Since *235notice of the tax sale was properly sent to the Tun-stalls, we are compelled to reverse.

The Tunstalls purchased the premises in question, their residence, in 1950. All taxes for the years 1961 through 1971, with the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Nelson v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Luskey v. Steffron, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  2. Associates Financial Services of America, Inc. v. SorensenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  3. City of Pittsburgh v. PivirottoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Joseph L. v. Office of Judicial Support, Etc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Bell v. E. B. ProvanceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API