Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Harold Dean Behrens, James D. Wilkett, James M. Wilkett, and Fred Weed

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1982No. 81-1086, 81-1187, 81-1186 and 81-1253PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

These consolidated appeals follow defendants’ convictions for conspiracy to unlawfully distribute narcotics in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Defendants seek reversal of the verdict against them primarily on grounds of prejudicial suppression of evidence by the prosecution, improper evidentiary determinations by the trial judge, and insufficiency of the evidence. We affirm.

I

In October 1980, a federal grand jury indicted seven persons for conspiracy to illegally distribute the narcotic Dilaudid. The named defendants included Harold Behrens, Dr. Thomas…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States v. Earl Watson, Tony Maxwell and Mae Lillian BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. PetersenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Marmon Dennis RecordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Phillip TroutmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Sammy G. Daily and Frederik A. FiggeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API