Baum v. Roper
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to stay the execution of a writ of possession. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal by J. W. Reay, Jr., from an order refusing to stay the execution of a writ of possession issued under a judgment in ejectment in favor of plaintiff and against defendants. Julius Baum brought an ejectment suit on the fourteenth day of April, 1892, against Edward Roper and wife, Kate Roper, and David J. Spence, to recover possession of a parcel of land situate at the southeast corner of Turk Street and Van Ness Avenue in the city and county of San Francisco, fronting fifty feet on Van Ness Avenue and one hundred and nine feet on Turk Street. Pending suit Julius Baum died, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- In re the Estate of CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Los Angeles County Bank v. RaynorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Spencer v. TrouttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Foster v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Nolte v. NolteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Dresser v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914