Speas v. Ford
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
Preliminarily we are confronted with the contention that Judge Phillips had no right to act on the motion, because defendant had no prior notice. The contention is without merit. The motion was made at the term at which the cause was calendared for trial. Before the jury was empaneled, the parties suggested to the court: “that a Pre-Trial Conference was necessary in order for the Court to pass on various motions and points of law raised by the pleadings.” The law applicable, and the reason therefor, is succinctly stated by Ervin, J., in Collins v. Highway Commission, 237 N.C. 277, 74 S.E. 2d…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Collins v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Mobley v. BroomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Stamey v. Rutherfordton Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights of Pythias Co. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted, Masons No. 72 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Swartzberg v. Reserve Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- North Carolina State Ports Authority v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- BW Acceptance Corporation v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Gillikin v. SpringleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Little v. StevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.