Legal Opinion
Chisholm-Ryder Co. v. Buck
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 30, 1932No. 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
Findings of Fact.(1) Urschel patents, Nos. 1,256,491 and 1,256,492, were issued on February 12, 1918, to a partnership of Cadiz, Ohio, known as Chisholm-Seott Company, without in any way identifying the partners composing such partnership on that date.(2) Ursehel- patent, No. 1,336,991, was issued on April 13, 1920, to William E. Ursehel, and assigned by him on May 15, 1920, to a partnership of Columbus, Ohio, known as Chisholm-Seott Company, without in any way identifying the partners composing said partnership on May 15, 1920.(3) In October and November, 1925, an…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chisholm-Ryder Co. v. BuckCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Rokap Corp. v. LammDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1935
- Union Shipbuilding Co. v. Boston Iron & Metal Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1936
- Tumbler v. Baltimore Paint & Color Works, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1935
- T. H. Symington & Son, Inc. v. Symington Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.