Legal Opinion

Louden v. Birt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1853PublishedCited by 16 opinions

ERROR to the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Assumpsit by Henry Birt upon a promissory note reading as follows :

“ Indianapolis, May 20th, 1848. Six months after date I promise to pay J. J. Owsley and Jacob Landis, or order, the sum of fifty-eight dollars and thirty-three cents, for value received, without any relief from valuation or appraisement laws. A. A. Louden."

The note shows an assignment on its back to the plaintiff.

The defendant, Louden, pleaded—

1. That said note was given for a part of the consideration of the purchase of a “ patent called Morris's improvement in door-plates,” which, it was represented to defendant, would be…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sinard v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1834
  2. Higgins v. StrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1836

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Willcuts v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Wolford v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Hynds v. HaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. School Town v. GrantIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API