Legal Opinion

Chan v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 9, 1991No. 91 C 4671PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint. For the following reasons, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

FACTS

Plaintiff Cory D. Chan (“Chan”) has been a Chicago police officer since 1973. 1 In July 1984, he was assigned to the Intelligence Section of the Chicago Police Department, Organized Crime Division, Bureau of Investigative Services (“Intelligence Section”). The following March, Chan began serving on the newly formed Chicago Terrorist Task Force (“Task Force”), a multi-agency group including the Intelligence…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rivera v. Lake CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  2. Treece v. Village of NapervilleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  3. National Service Ass'n v. Capitol Bankers Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Park Ridge Public LibraryDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  5. Ford v. DavisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API