Cashion v. Texas Gulf, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
The only issue we must decide is whether there was a genuine material issue of fact which would preclude the trial court’s allowance of defendants’ motion for summary judgment. After careful consideration of the record herein, we conclude that there is no genuine material issue of fact in the case sub judice.
It is well settled that a Rule 56 motion for summary judgment should be allowed only when there exists no triable genuine issue of material fact and the movant’s forecast of the evidence demonstrates that it is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Feibus & Co. v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Feibus & Co., Inc. v. Godley Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Taylor v. Greensboro News Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Priddy v. Cook's United Department StoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Myrick v. CooleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Egan v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Myrick v. CooleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988