Priddy v. Cook's United Department Store
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Judge.
The complaint and plaintiff’s affidavit affirmatively show that the claims for assault and false imprisonment arose more than one year before the suit was instituted. These claims are therefore barred by the one-year statute of limitation applicable to both claims. G.S. 1-54(3).
The only question presented on appeal is whether the trial judge correctly concluded that no genuine issue of fact exists as to plaintiff’s claim for malicious prosecution. We hold that he did and affirm his order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
Want of probable cause is an essential…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Griffis v. . SellarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
- Smith v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Moore v. . WinfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Overton v. . CombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Haddad v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Myrick v. CooleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- House v. AneHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- Kling v. Harris Teeter Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
- Falkner v. AlmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Cashion v. Texas Gulf, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.