Legal Opinion
In Re Livent, Inc. Noteholders Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 4, 2005No. 98 Civ. 7161(VM)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Lead plaintiffs Dorian and Diane King (“Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and a class of investors who purchased some of the $125 million in 9 3/8% Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2004 (“the Notes”) issued by Livent, Inc. (“Livent”), have filed for summary judgment on their claims against defendants Garth Drabinsky (“Drabinsky”) and Myron Gottlieb (“Gottlieb”) under Section 11 of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77k (“Section ll”). 1 In brief, Plaintiffs allege that Drabinsky and Gottlieb violated Section 11(a) by signing a Registration Statement for…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Patterson v. County of OneidaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- National Bank of Arizona v. ThrustonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. MeltzerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Hart v. Rick's Cabaret International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Kramer Ex Rel. Estate of Singh v. Sooklall (In Re Singh)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.