Legal Opinion

Crow v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 13, 2019No. A18-0034PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THISSEN, Justice.

In 2005, a jury found appellant Keith Hapana Crow (Crow) guilty of aiding and *7abetting the first-degree felony murder of Robert Berry, Jr. (Berry). On direct appeal, we affirmed Crow's conviction. State v. Crow , 730 N.W.2d 272 (Minn. 2007). Over the next six years-in 2008, 2009, and 2013-Crow filed three petitions for postconviction relief. Each was summarily denied by a postconviction court. On August 18, 2017, Crow filed the present petition for postconviction relief-his fourth overall-which was also summarily denied by the postconviction court without an evidentiary…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. State v. MahkukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bradford Cain Dopkins v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  2. Jermaine Edward Harris v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  3. Milton K. Sanders, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
  4. State of Minnesota v. Atravius Joseph WeeksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API