Legal Opinion
Pope v. Mississippi Real Estate Commission
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided April 5, 1988No. Civ. A. EC 84-265-D-DPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVIDSON, District Judge.
James William Pope, Sr. and Mary Ann Pope (“Popes", “plaintiffs” or “non-movants”) have brought this action against both private and government defendants 1 claiming violations of both federal and state law. The plaintiffs’ claims against the private defendants include federal antitrust violations and the following state law claims: state antitrust violations; interference with economic relations, business relations, and business contacts in violation of state laws; and libel, slander, and defamation. Plaintiffs’ claims against the government…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- James William Pope v. Mississippi Real Estate CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Garris v. Governing Board of the South Carolina Reinsurance FacilitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Dickens v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1994
- American Management Corp. v. DunlapDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1992
- Foster v. Globe Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.