Legal Opinion
(PC) Cato v. Denning
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 9, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00951Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES CATO, JR., No. 1:19-cv-00951-NONE-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING 13 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT 14 M. DENNING, et al., (Doc. Nos. 28, 31) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff James Cato, Jr., an inmate appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, brought this 19 action under
42 U.S.C. § 1983
against several state correctional officers for violating his First 20 Amendment rights. (Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiff now moves to hold defendants in civil…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gomez v. VernonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. BrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Clement v. California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Massachusetts Asset Financing Corp. v. Harter, Secrest & Emery, LLPDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002