Legal Opinion

State v. Stephens

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1980No. 18PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Defendant challenges the trial court’s refusal to suppress certain incriminating statements defendant made immediately following a polygraph test administered to him by SBI Agent Steve Davenport. Admission of the statements constitutes defendant’s fifteenth and sixteenth assignments of error. We first ascertain the factual basis for these assignments.

The record reveals that defendant and his attorney, William Heafner, were present in the SBI Office in Raleigh on 10 November 1976. Defendant said he was there “to take the polygraph examination.” The SBI agent advised him of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. State v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  4. State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  5. State v. MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API