Fecko v. Tarczynski
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
Defendant Leona Kowalczyk was the payee in a $1,000 promissory note given by defendant Tarczynski. The note was payable on demand. For a valuable consideration and before demand for payment, Mrs. Kowalczyk transferred the note to plaintiffs. The indorsement was as follows:
“For value received I hereby assign all my rights, title and interest to the within note to Nicholas Fecko and Mary Fecko, his wife. Dated July 10, 1933.
“ (Sgd) Leona Kowalczyk. ’ ’
Thereafter demand for payment was made but refused. Plaintiffs assert there was proper protest and notice of nonpayment. Plaintiffs sued on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Evans v. Freeman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Markey v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Aniba v. YeomansMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. KearsleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Gale v. MayhewMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- First Valley Bank v. First Savings & Loan Ass'n of Central IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Implement Credit Corp. v. ElsingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Auto Purchase Corp. v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Implement Credit Corp. v. ElsingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954